LINUX.ORG.RU
ФорумTalks

У кого ... меньше?


0

0

PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.026 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.026 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.029 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.021 ms

Re: У кого ... меньше?

Шняга полная. Ибо чо делать если частота ЦП меняется постоянно, дядя?

Gharik ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

у меня в 7-8 раз больше, чем у топикстартера :(

selezian ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от Gharik

Re: У кого ... меньше?

> Шняга полная. Ибо чо делать если частота ЦП меняется постоянно, дядя?

Делай аборт ноутбучное быдло :)

ps:

~ % ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.065 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.050 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.058 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.066 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

radws% ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=-0.007 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=-0.003 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=-0.011 ms

wfrr ★★☆ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

bash: PING: command not found

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

ping -c 5 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.063 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.097 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.100 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.099 ms

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.063/0.090/0.100/0.014 ms

mono ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

Лучше так:

PING 217.76.32.61 (217.76.32.61) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=86.0 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=84.8 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=86.4 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=85.4 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=85.1 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=85.6 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=85.3 ms
64 bytes from 217.76.32.61: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=85.0 ms

cthulhu ★☆ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.000 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.200 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=-0.001 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=-0.019 ms


anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

Я первый.

C:\Users\vsb>ping 127.0.0.1

Обмен пакетами с 127.0.0.1 по с 32 байт данных:

Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128
Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128
Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128
Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128

Статистика Ping для 127.0.0.1:
    Пакетов: отправлено = 4, получено = 4, потеряно = 0
    (0% потерь)
Приблизительное время приема-передачи в мс:
    Минимальное = 0мсек, Максимальное = 0 мсек, Среднее = 0 мсек

Legioner ★★★★★ ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от gnomino

Re: У кого ... меньше?

У коминтерна:

astral% ping 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) torsions of field. 64 torsions from 127.0.0.1: acmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=-∞² ns 64 torsions from 127.0.0.1: acmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=-∞² ns 64 torsions from 127.0.0.1: acmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=-∞² ns

Только, что по астралу узнал.

wfrr ★★☆ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

C:\>ping 127.0.0.1

Обмен пакетами с 127.0.0.1 по 32 байт:

Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128 Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128 Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128 Ответ от 127.0.0.1: число байт=32 время<1мс TTL=128

Статистика Ping для 127.0.0.1: Пакетов: отправлено = 4, получено = 4, потеряно = 0 (0% потерь), Приблизительное время приема-передачи в мс: Минимальное = 0мсек, Максимальное = 0 мсек, Среднее = 0 мсек

P. S. Нахожусь в предвкушении веселого представления...

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

demon37@developer ~ $ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.087 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.088 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.083 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.089 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.090 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.096 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.081 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.081 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.087 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms

Demon37 ★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.025 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.013 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.013 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.021 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 9996ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.013/0.018/0.025/0.004 ms

anonymous ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от anonymous

Re: У кого ... меньше?

фрматирование блин
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.025 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.013 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.013 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.021 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 9996ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.013/0.018/0.025/0.004 ms

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

$ping 127.0.0.1
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
=/

cobold ★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

$ ping6 ::1 PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms

--- ::1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2997ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.030/0.030/0.032/0.006 ms

з.ы. тема лол.

anonymous ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от anonymous

Re: У кого ... меньше?

$ ping6 ::1 PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms

--- ::1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2997ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.030/0.030/0.032/0.006 ms

то есть

anonymous ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от anonymous

Re: У кого ... меньше?

$ ping6 ::1
PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms

--- ::1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2997ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.030/0.030/0.032/0.006 ms

да блин!

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

Раз:

PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.042 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.037 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms


Два:

PING www.linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=32.0 ms
64 bytes from linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=31.7 ms
64 bytes from linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=34.1 ms
64 bytes from linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=31.2 ms
64 bytes from linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=30.6 ms

Quasar ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.018 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.016 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.017 ms

KRoN73 ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

конкурс на лучшего попингуя? ))

$ ping -c 5 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.029 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.027/0.029/0.031/0.006 ms

Crocodille ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

вот она, жопа мира.

[andrey@wk2 ~]$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 127.0.0.1 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded
From 127.0.0.1 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded
From 127.0.0.1 icmp_seq=3 Time to live exceeded
From 127.0.0.1 icmp_seq=4 Time to live exceeded

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 2998ms

chocholl ★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 octets data
64 octets from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
64 octets from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
64 octets from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
64 octets from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms

Вот так все просто было в Slackware 8.0 :)

mky ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

У меня больше почти в 2 раза. Самое меньшее 0.038

hibou ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

(~)! ping -fc100 127.1
PING 127.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
...................................................
--- 127.1 ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 49 packets received, 51.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.026/0.039/0.132/0.021 ms

(~)! ping6 -fc100 ::1
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) ::1 --> ::1
.
--- ::1 ping6 statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.060/0.087/0.459/0.076 ms

(~)! ping -fc100 www.linux.org.ru
PING www.linux.org.ru (217.76.32.61): 56 data bytes
......
--- www.linux.org.ru ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 96 packets received, 4.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 22.703/23.537/25.039/0.556 ms

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

user@linux-suse103:~> ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.059 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.045 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.042 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.046 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.036 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.046 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.043 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms

--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.035/0.044/0.059/0.008 ms

HighwayStar ★★★★★ ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

браво! внес в свою коллекцию бреда :)))

Rastafarra ★★★ ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от redgremlin

Re: У кого ... меньше?

64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms

redgremlin ★★★★★ ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от Gharik

Re: У кого ... меньше?

>Шняга полная. Ибо чо делать если частота ЦП меняется постоянно, дядя?

Почитай о ACPI timer, балабольное быдло!

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

cpu% ip/ping 127.0.0.1
sending 32 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmp!127.0.0.1!1
0: rtt 57 µs, avg rtt 57 µs, ttl = 255
1: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 56 µs, ttl = 255
2: rtt 55 µs, avg rtt 56 µs, ttl = 255
3: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 56 µs, ttl = 255
4: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 54 µs, ttl = 255
5: rtt 55 µs, avg rtt 54 µs, ttl = 255
6: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 54 µs, ttl = 255
7: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 55 µs, ttl = 255
8: rtt 50 µs, avg rtt 54 µs, ttl = 255
9: rtt 48 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
10: rtt 53 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
11: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
12: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
13: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
14: rtt 47 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
15: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
16: rtt 52 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
17: rtt 47 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
18: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
19: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
20: rtt 47 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
21: rtt 72 µs, avg rtt 52 µs, ttl = 255
22: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
23: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
24: rtt 57 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
25: rtt 54 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
26: rtt 56 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
27: rtt 49 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
28: rtt 55 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
29: rtt 55 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
30: rtt 50 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
31: rtt 52 µs, avg rtt 53 µs, ttl = 255
cpu% 

robot12 ★★★★★ ()
Ответ на: Re: У кого ... меньше? от robot12

Re: У кого ... меньше?

64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.046 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.052 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.048 ms

enzo74 ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

PINGвины хреновы

Git ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

# ping 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 is alive

anonymous ()

Re: У кого ... меньше?

>PING

А эта что за команда? У меню такой нет.

vada ★★★★★ ()
Вы не можете добавлять комментарии в эту тему. Тема перемещена в архив.