История изменений
Исправление AP, (текущая версия) :
С реддита подвезли контекст.
He wasn’t expelled for that paper, but rather this was the last straw. And he wasn’t banned from the committee, that is borderline impossible, but rather the organization he was representing told him to fuck off and don’t represent them anymore. If he can find different organization to represent, he can still attend (fuck, wg21 cannot ban LITERAL SEX OFFENDER AND CSAM CONNOSIEUR from attending, what makes you think they can ban someone kinda annoying to work with?).
What actually happened: Tomazos has been on lot of people’s shit list, because his contributions suck. If you don’t have access to the mailing lists, he posts output from ChatGPT as his contributions, and when called out, defends it, arguing that ChatGPT is actually superior to human reasoning already… Anyway, this paper was another in series of sucky contributions, it is barely concealed ChatGPT output submitted to wg21 for processing.
He was told that people don’t like his paper’s name, and he was asked to change it. He decided that the title is too important to his ViSiOn for the chatgpt BS submitted as a paper, and that he won’t change the title. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back and his «sponsor» told him to fuck off.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gynl1v/comment/lyq647s/
Есть как минимум одно подтверждение:
I can confirm this is exactly what happened. This member was effectively a denial of service attack on the committee’s ability to operate. Not only did they not address concerns that were privately relayed to them, but they took the disagreement public by reposting their refusal to a public mailing list in order to further create controversy. That person’s sponsor simply gave up on enabling their behavior and withdrew a complementary good will service.
he fact anyone is characterizing this as «expelled» is misunderstood, absurd, and probably bad faith attempt to create controversy. This is nothing more actions having consequences. This person is free to pay for another way to join ISO – just like the convicted sex offender did.
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1gyo81u/comment/lyq8v70/
Расходимся?
Исходная версия AP, :
С реддита подвезли контекст.
He wasn’t expelled for that paper, but rather this was the last straw. And he wasn’t banned from the committee, that is borderline impossible, but rather the organization he was representing told him to fuck off and don’t represent them anymore. If he can find different organization to represent, he can still attend (fuck, wg21 cannot ban LITERAL SEX OFFENDER AND CSAM CONNOSIEUR from attending, what makes you think they can ban someone kinda annoying to work with?).
What actually happened: Tomazos has been on lot of people’s shit list, because his contributions suck. If you don’t have access to the mailing lists, he posts output from ChatGPT as his contributions, and when called out, defends it, arguing that ChatGPT is actually superior to human reasoning already… Anyway, this paper was another in series of sucky contributions, it is barely concealed ChatGPT output submitted to wg21 for processing.
He was told that people don’t like his paper’s name, and he was asked to change it. He decided that the title is too important to his ViSiOn for the chatgpt BS submitted as a paper, and that he won’t change the title. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back and his «sponsor» told him to fuck off.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gynl1v/comment/lyq647s/
Расходимся?