Исправление unC0Rr, (текущая версия) :
Нет, не позволяют. Только правообладатель определяет лицензию. BSD позволит использовать код на более ограниченных условиях, например, под проприетарной лицензией или GPL, но код как был под BSD, так и остаётся.
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/75436/relicense-bsd-2-3-clause-code-to-gpl
The license of original code cannot be changed without your permission.
No, you can’t relicense someone else’s MIT or BSD code, only code you’ve written. Only a copyright holder can license his/her code, or someone to whom the copyright holder has given explicit permission to do so.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/821608/relicensing-a-bsd-library
You can’t remove the BSD license. What you can do is put it under another license also
Software relicensing is applied in open-source software development when software licenses of software modules are incompatible
BSD licenses (in the three-clause and two-clause forms, though not the original four-clause form), MPL 2.0, and LGPL, are GPL-compatible.
Все ссылки только подтверждают сказанное мной.
Исходная версия unC0Rr, :
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/75436/relicense-bsd-2-3-clause-code-to-gpl
The license of original code cannot be changed without your permission.
No, you can’t relicense someone else’s MIT or BSD code, only code you’ve written. Only a copyright holder can license his/her code, or someone to whom the copyright holder has given explicit permission to do so.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/821608/relicensing-a-bsd-library
You can’t remove the BSD license. What you can do is put it under another license also
Software relicensing is applied in open-source software development when software licenses of software modules are incompatible
BSD licenses (in the three-clause and two-clause forms, though not the original four-clause form), MPL 2.0, and LGPL, are GPL-compatible.